Technology & treatment-train selection
Compare remediation options against source strength, hydrogeology, receptors, and regulatory drivers — and design the combination that actually fits the site.
PFAS remediation
Independent, evidence-led support for the hardest contamination problem in the industry — from treatment-technology selection and feasibility testing to remediation design and defensible reporting.
The challenge
Their persistence and mobility make source zones at airports, fire-training grounds, and industrial sites a long-term liability — and conventional methods struggle, especially with mobile short-chain compounds.
The value of good PFAS work is not picking a single technology — it's matching the right combination of methods to the site, then proving it will hold up to scrutiny.
What we do
Compare remediation options against source strength, hydrogeology, receptors, and regulatory drivers — and design the combination that actually fits the site.
Column and bench experiments to test desorption, mobilisation, and treatment performance before committing to a field programme.
PFAS quantification, suspect screening, and data interpretation across soil, water, foam, and treatment streams — turning results into decisions.
Conceptual site models, sampling and monitoring design, exposure pathways, and risk-based decision support for impacted sites.
Contaminant transport, desorption, and mass-balance modelling to support remediation design and scale-up from bench to field.
Clear assumptions, transparent interpretation, and recommendations a technical team, regulator, or project board can act on.
Treatment methods we assess
Aquentis evaluates and combines these approaches rather than defaulting to any one of them.
In-situ mobilisation of surface-active PFAS from saturated source zones, with foam as a dedicated capture pathway.
Concentrating PFAS from water by air–water interfacial enrichment, reducing the volume that needs destructive treatment.
Ex-situ source treatment to separate and concentrate PFAS mass from excavated soil.
Adsorption and polishing for treated water, with media selection informed by chain-length and matrix.
Hydraulic containment and above-ground treatment where plume control is the priority.
Nature-based uptake as part of a longer-term or lower-intensity management strategy.
Evaluation of destruction options for the concentrated streams that separation technologies produce.
Dedicated steps for the mobile short-chain PFAS that ride with water and evade foam capture.
Research-backed
Our recommendations are built on published, open-access research — including a controlled column study on air sparging and foam fractionation for AFFF-impacted soil.
Who we work with
Aquentis works with international clients — site operators and industry, engineering consultancies needing specialist PFAS depth as a subcontractor, and regulators and agencies building guidance and reviewing evidence.
Enquire
Share a short, non-confidential summary of the site or stream, the decision you need to make, and the data you already have. We'll come back with how we can help.
Prefer email? Write to info@aquentisenviroconsultancy.com.