PFAS remediation

PFAS remediation for contaminated soil and water

Independent, evidence-led support for the hardest contamination problem in the industry — from treatment-technology selection and feasibility testing to remediation design and defensible reporting.

The challenge

PFAS don't behave like other contaminants.

Their persistence and mobility make source zones at airports, fire-training grounds, and industrial sites a long-term liability — and conventional methods struggle, especially with mobile short-chain compounds.

The value of good PFAS work is not picking a single technology — it's matching the right combination of methods to the site, then proving it will hold up to scrutiny.

What we do

Specialist PFAS support, from first question to defensible decision.

Screening

Technology & treatment-train selection

Compare remediation options against source strength, hydrogeology, receptors, and regulatory drivers — and design the combination that actually fits the site.

Feasibility

Bench-scale testing & feasibility

Column and bench experiments to test desorption, mobilisation, and treatment performance before committing to a field programme.

LC-MS/MS

Analytical interpretation

PFAS quantification, suspect screening, and data interpretation across soil, water, foam, and treatment streams — turning results into decisions.

Monitoring

Monitoring & site strategy

Conceptual site models, sampling and monitoring design, exposure pathways, and risk-based decision support for impacted sites.

Modelling

Fate & transport modelling

Contaminant transport, desorption, and mass-balance modelling to support remediation design and scale-up from bench to field.

Reporting

Regulator-facing reporting

Clear assumptions, transparent interpretation, and recommendations a technical team, regulator, or project board can act on.

Treatment methods we assess

The full PFAS toolkit — matched to your site.

Aquentis evaluates and combines these approaches rather than defaulting to any one of them.

Air sparging with foam capture

In-situ mobilisation of surface-active PFAS from saturated source zones, with foam as a dedicated capture pathway.

Foam fractionation

Concentrating PFAS from water by air–water interfacial enrichment, reducing the volume that needs destructive treatment.

Soil washing

Ex-situ source treatment to separate and concentrate PFAS mass from excavated soil.

Granular activated carbon & ion exchange

Adsorption and polishing for treated water, with media selection informed by chain-length and matrix.

Pump and treat

Hydraulic containment and above-ground treatment where plume control is the priority.

Phytoremediation

Nature-based uptake as part of a longer-term or lower-intensity management strategy.

Destructive treatment of concentrates

Evaluation of destruction options for the concentrated streams that separation technologies produce.

Short-chain polishing

Dedicated steps for the mobile short-chain PFAS that ride with water and evade foam capture.

Research-backed

Grounded in peer-reviewed PFAS research.

Our recommendations are built on published, open-access research — including a controlled column study on air sparging and foam fractionation for AFFF-impacted soil.

up to 38%of PFOA captured in foam under sparging
21%of PFHpS exported with air vs 3.5% water-only
~30×rise in aqueous PFOS under sparging

Read the full paper — Chemical Engineering Journal (2026)

Who we work with

Specialist PFAS input, wherever the site is.

Aquentis works with international clients — site operators and industry, engineering consultancies needing specialist PFAS depth as a subcontractor, and regulators and agencies building guidance and reviewing evidence.

Enquire

Tell us about your PFAS challenge.

Share a short, non-confidential summary of the site or stream, the decision you need to make, and the data you already have. We'll come back with how we can help.

Prefer email? Write to info@aquentisenviroconsultancy.com.

By sending, you agree we may use your details to respond. See our privacy policy.